Sunday, August 27, 2017

Chandani Chowk Interchange, Pune: Thoughts of Yogesh Dandekar

Yesterday the foundation stone was laid for proposed interchange at Chandani Chowk junction in Pune, India. We all have apprehensions about appropriateness of the scheme.
My friend Yogesh Dandekar has written very appropriately about the proposed scheme and issues that are apparently left unaddressed.
Sharing his thoughts in his own words:
Open letter to the Honourable minister
We are making improvements to one of the major junctions which is a very busy entry on the west of Pune. Located on the heavily used NH4, part of the golden quandrangle.
The highway without doubt has to have smooth passage and should have the least obstruction. The new flyover or interchange to be developed would definitely be a boon for the vehicles. Hopefully the 5 major roads (in fact there are 6 — one going to an institute of National importance-NDA) would have stopping less and signal less movement.
Having used the junction for many years, I would like to get your attention to some of the other points which need attention.
Probably the accidents have happened not because of vehicle moving, because there is a mixed use beyond vehicles.
I have just now seen the video at the foundation stone laying ceremony explaining how the traffic will move.
As designers and thinkers who see every piece of public design intervention in the city to be done keeping people at Center of the design.
Hopefully these have been thought about during the design. Some visualisation shared in the news papers were short of explaining the actual design. The diagram in the news paper is not giving a correct explanation. And the reason to be skeptical is Pune’s history of building incorrect flyovers with a very short term vision.
Interchange does not mean only for smooth flow of traffic/vehicles. This is possible for a remote crossing of two highways where there is no city/settlement next to it.
Such an interchange means exchange of multiple modes of transport. A bus going from Mumbai to Bangalore can drop a family of 4 at this point and the next part of their journey will happen by an auto or taxi or someone coming to pick up. Has this been thought about? You may like it or not? People are going to use the location in this manner whether you allow it or don’t. Get the roads done, open the flyovers and you will see people walking in the extreme left or right of the road with their heavy bags, kids and fearing the high speed vehicles. We can see this happening on the Pune Mumbai expressway at Kalamboli junction. Then why don’t we provide for the facilities. It’s a great interchange for long distance ST buses to avoid coming to the city Center and adding to the congestion. Many buses actually drop/ pick up passengers here.
In such large developments we miss out on one important factor. Pedestrian movement. There are going to be a number of people negotiating this interchange on foot. The reason can be the previous observation or even changing a PMPML bus. The why not make it safe and comfortable. I use this place as an interchange to take a bus for Mulshi. How will I walk? People should be able to reach multiple points without negotiating the traffic which is now going to become more fast and ruthless as it has the right of way.
The Kothrud depot is just 1.2 km from Chandni Chowk. Can busses be extended till Chandni Chowk which can become a great connection to the buses plying on highway. This is in line with the larger idea of radial roads connected to the planned ring- road. This will become the fastest way for people using bus to reach Katraj on one end or Pimpri Chinchwad on the other end.
Ideally the master planning should keep provision for a metro station which can be easily built by extending the metro line 2 of Pune metro and the line can go further. Don’t build the metro now, but a site contours can be very well exploited to create make provision and a good interchanged for the future. If a metro station is built, it will be the best point for interchange from a highway to a MRT system in the the city.
Cycling in now being promoted. A dedicated cycle lane should be provided.
I completely agree and believe that such projects after implementation need stringent regulation.
Regulation is the critical aspect of this interchange to work as it starts operations. My suggestion is NOT to make it into a destination with shops / eateries. It only has to be a super efficient interchange. DONT provide any parking. Keep limited slots for autos and taxies l, and give very functional shelter for the bus passengers wanting to change the buses for onward journey to far-off destination or to travel towards a location inside the city. Any activity which encourages long duration halts including parking should be discouraged. There will be a few small convenience shops which are essential for items like fast food, tea, water, magazines and also make these destinations safer having an ubiquitous human presence.
Imagine a old lady trying to come from one bus and walking towards the rickshaw stand does not have to negotiate lots of steps and even probably uses a lift to change levels. A IT employee can report to the designated pickup point for long distance buses for Bangalore pulling his stroller heading home for Diwali vacation. A person coming from Mumbai can book a cab which can report at a designated point which are duly signed and marked. A professional for a business visit to Mumbai, is dropped by his brother early in the morning at 6:00 am. The ST ticket conductor and controller would have better place to work. I have used the ST stop on the highway. It lacks basic hygiene the conductor himself or herself (yes there are very gutsy young lady conductors who ensure passengers get right buses at 6:00 am in the morning.)
Currently there are no public toilets at the bus pickup points. And people have no choice but to go out in the open.
There could be a concern on how to get space for all these activities. Ideally such planning should have happened long time ago. In fact, the spaces around the junction started getting developed into large societies and residential development as soon as this redevelopment was announced. The access roads to these plush gated communities would create another challenge to a smooth traffic. Has this been thought through.
And finally Pune roads specially flyovers have an habit of putting direction signs exactly where the road splits. It’s ok for pedestrians not for vehicles. We should min have 3 signs before reaching the decision making point. This is critical for a smooth flow. There is a science to this and not governed by some engineers act of tick-marking a checklist to include signage in the overall project implementation.
The wish list can be a long one and if we sit together priorities can be set and a design can be done, but I am hopeful the infrastructure development would not have a blind eye to many of the points above which are genuine requirements as people would start using it as per their convenience. Look at any uncontrolled infrastructure project.
An auto rickshaw will stop on the roads looking for passengers, a bus dropping passengers will halt the traffic, people getting down from the bus would be getting killed under the speedy vehicles, bus stops which are actually official pickup points would be as dirty and filthy as they are entirely neglected.
We only see vehicle congestion. But fail to see how people use it and design it accordingly. Design thinking has the power.
The entire interchange should be monitored using cameras. There will be clear signing, city map and information of the connecting bus routes, clearly identified auto / taxi pickup points and designated areas for bus drop-off and pickup.
This is not just an interchange for vehicles to smoothly move with speed. This is a real interchange for people. Let’s design and built it that way.

Thursday, September 1, 2016

44 years of Architects Act

Education perspective…

It is 44 years today since the Architects Act was enacted by the Parliament on 1st September 1972. I was just wondering how much purpose the Act has served. 
Less than 1% of all the buildings getting built in India are designed by Architects. The society is not sure what role an architect can play to improve its environment and life. Many educated people confuse between Architect and Architecture. In short, we are yet to arrive on scene for a common man.
After explosion 0f Schools of Architecture in India over last 10 years, now a better number of students passing out of higher secondary school identify architecture a one of the career options. Still fewer opt for it. And small minority amongst those who actually join the course know as they join, what Architects do.
Very few education administrators and decision makers know difference between an Architect and a Civil engineer. No need to say still fewer know the difference between architecture and civil engineering education.
In many institutions of higher education ‘Architecture’ is merely a department in the college of engineering or a small board of studies under faculty of engineering.

We still have long way to go!!

Monday, August 8, 2016

Some thoughts on Trans Maharashtra Expressway…


Some thoughts on Trans Maharashtra Expressway…

Hon. Chief Minister has promised a Trans Maharashtra Expressway to Connect South-Western Maharashtra with Vidarbh region. Surely it is a dream project that will facilitate fast movement of goods and people across the region. We have in last couple of decades built number of highways and also augmented a few. However, Maharashtra roads have never reached the standards maintained in other states, forget the world standards. Take example of NH4 or now AH47 that connects Mumbai with Bangalore. As soon as one crosses from Maharashtra into Karnataka the difference is visible. There is difference in quality of road surface, curbing, facilities, geometry and what not. It is hard to believe that this is part of same highway that one is traveling on from Pune.

I have a wish list for designers of Trans Maharashtra Expressway:

1.       The road shall originate near Banda, the southernmost part of Maharashtra and end near Kopela or Ankisa in Gadchiroli district with a branch also reaching Manibeli in Khandesh region.

2.       It should not enter any town or city and shall run keeping minimum distance of 30-35 kms from edge of any town, city or settlement.

3.       There should be grade-separated interchanges with links connecting the large town from nearest passing point.

4.       Wherever the road has no option but to pass near or through the settlement the road must be elevated or sunk to segregate the fast moving vehicular traffic.

5.       Entire road (right of way) shall be fenced with electric fence to stop cattle, stray animals and also human beings from entering the right of way in unauthorized manner.

6.       Access to link roads as well as above referred facilities shall be strictly through service roads only.

7.       No toll booths shall be located on main expressway but they shall be located on entry/exit links.

8.       There should be a stopping bay with washrooms at interval of 5 kms; a fuel pump with convenience shop, café with washrooms, emergency medical van, control/monitoring room with police beat-box and small parking at interval of 30 kms and full-fledged large parking, fuel pump, service facility, grocery shop, restaurants, Clinic, etc. at interval of 90 kms.

9.       At all locations where the slope or grade exceeds 1:40 additional lanes for heavy vehicles shall be provided to help them negotiate the slope without causing hindrance to light vehicles.

10.   The entire expressway shall be designed for average speed of 130 kms per hour for all types of vehicles.

11.   Minimum width of median shall be 7.5 meters and minimum right of way for the road shall be 60 meters, ideally 100 meters.

12.   There should be 4 lanes in each direction of width 4 meters each and shoulder/ refuse area shall be 10 meters wide.

13.   All bridges shall have footpath (not meant for pedestrians) on either side of carriageway of minimum width of 1.5 meters, beyond minimum shoulder of 1.5 meters.

14.   Entire road shall be under surveillance of cameras and speed detecting cameras located at every 5 kms distance, near midpoint between two stopping bays, and also at all vulnerable locations.

15.   Entire road shall be lined with tall growing trees to cut down speed of wind and also to provide shade where possible, while ensuring visibility of minimum 300 meters in both directions.

I hope this wish list will be duly considered while designing the road and related infrastructure.

Readers may please contribute.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

EDUCATION IN ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING IN INDIA

Few days ago for while going through some references regarding Architecture education, I once again referred to the Article of Prof. Jaimini Mehta1 and Speech of Prof. Christopher Benninger2, deliberating respectively about past and future of Architecture education in India. Both raised in my mind many questions about the way Architecture education has shaped over past century and also the relation of Architecture profession and Engineering discipline, particularly as it has emerged in the modern India. Thinking over it for a while gave rise to an assumption that I am trying to put here as a kind of hypothesis.

Although Architecture as profession was in practice in India for ages, in the comparatively recent past the community looked at it as a craft (Kala) rather than a branch of knowledge (Vidya). As a result, it was passed on from generation to generation as a skill set with craftsmanship as its backbone and little knowledge about why and how that was particularly evident in the ancient texts and treatises such as Samarangan Sutradhar, Mayamata, etc. As the population grew and the power (political and economic) of Indian kings and dynasties diminished during 19th century, the Architecture profession akin to the way it is practiced now had its beginning during British Raj.

However, the British rulers never wanted to start Architecture education in India. Architecture is direct and most effective expression of power and culture. Architecture is patron based art. Unlike other arts, Architecture needs patron first before the architect can perform. As such, historically almost all significant projects of Architecture were regally commissioned. Sometimes, it was religion rather than the king, as in case of Vatican. Many a times the edifice in making was related to religion (Temple, church, etc.) As a result, the Architecture so produced strongly reflected power and culture of the patron. It had its effect in making a lasting impression on the community. Many a times such architecture, when secular in nature, shaped the emerging building typology and also the social behavior.

For this very reason the British always wanted their own Architects who through their works could project British culture and supremacy. They inaugurated the course at Sir J. J. College of Art, Mumbai to train architectural assistants to assist the British Architects. All the major projects in Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and New Delhi were assigned to British Architects. In those times it took long to travel from Britain to India by sea and it was not possible for the architects to frequently visit India. A few architects settled here but many relied on trained draftsmen and assistants to take care of minor day to day decisions required on site. Sir J. J. College of Architecture served as a training base that produced assistants who understood the language of drawings and faithfully able to produce details required on site. Although, some Architects, particularly Claude Batley, were sympathetic to requirements of Indian society, climate and architectural tradition, the base of most of the architectural works remained European in terms of basic form and its arrangement. Indian motifs and craft were only superficially used. The training laid emphasis on Art and Craft of construction.

Till India became independent no full-fledged architecture course was started in India. Just around the dawn of independence, new schools emerged at Delhi, Vadodara, Kolkata and little later in Pune. Till such time, if any Indian wanted to study Architecture, after due training at Mumbai, he had to go to UK and appear for RIBA examination. The whole process was time consuming, expensive and beyond reach of most of the aspirants. Architecture education hence was reserved for few affluent people.

On the other hand, to fulfill the dreams of British rulers and Architects they required platoons of Engineers. For this reason they established engineering colleges, particularly to train civil engineers who could supervise the architectural projects. Due to presence of these courses good number of civil engineers got trained and also started serving the common man and community in general, as builders of the buildings that were required to be built and also as designers in absence of Architects. Immediately after independence with change in rule, British Architects were not wanted by the rulers and Indian Architects were simply not there at all. That led to a vacuum in terms of architectural service providers. Being closest to Architects, Civil Engineers who were available in abundance and also working as builders for petty works, moved in to fill the vacuum. All the positions that were actually required to be occupied by architects were occupied by engineers as temporary measure. Till today these posts remain to be occupied by engineers.

This has also led to another dilemma in the field of planning. World over, planning in part of architecture and the training courses in planning are often extension to architecture schools. Although multidisciplinary in nature planning is considered as part and parcel of umbrella discipline of Architecture. In India, due to the absence of architects during initial years, planning was looked at as training course for engineers (and few architects) in service of public works departments and local authorities who required planners to create ‘Master plans’ for towns and cities.

There is very well defined distinction in the training of Architects and Engineers. The Engineering approach is basically of ‘Problem solving’ nature, believing in Universal solution. Architecture approach on other had is ‘Context based’ and therefore local rather than universal, taking into account local climate, culture, materials, aesthetic beliefs and community practices. In absence of such grounding in basic training, engineers planners failed to deliver the proposals that could really lead to improvement in the overall functioning and lifestyle of community.

The educationist, decision makers in government and the community in general must realize and take steps to correct this situation soon as possible.

Reference:


Benninger Christopher. Future of Architecture Education, Ahmedabad 2012

 

 

 

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

New DP for PUNE


The new development plan for Pune (old PMC area) is about to be approved and released for suggestions and objections from citizens. Although it is not released as yet, from news paper releases lot of things are being discussed.

It is projected as sustainable development plan. What is sustainable about it and where it will lead us to still remains to be seen. From the news paper reports we can see that the plan aims at development of business for particular section of businessmen and society.  Grant the additional floor space to all interested parties is the theme of this plan. Granting of additional FSI is at some places illogical and at other places indiscriminate in nature. Such additional FSI and resultant higher occupancy will add to crowding on roads and put further strain on the roads thus leading to slowing down of traffic and resultant pollution. How can we call this development plan to be sustainable?

The affordable housing development will get higher FSI. Who will monitor the construction and final occupancy whether the houses are actually occupied by the section of society it is meant for? In north-eastern part of Pune we can see the houses that are built for lower income group under urban land Ceiling Act scheme are actually occupied by cream of cream of the society. Fate of affordable housing, if not implemented and regulated properly, will not be any different.

There is scheme to grant additional FSI for rental housing. PMC is to control and monitor to whom these houses will be allotted. They are basically small houses meant for urban poor and low income group. I sincerely hope that enough such houses will get built and will be allotted to ‘right’ people without asking for any favours.

There is a scheme for additional FSI for hostels built in 500 meters periphery of educational institute if you have tie up with the institute. What happens if such tie up or agreement is terminated after certain period and the building is then sold as apartments or converted to hotel? Also, there are many charitable trusts running hostels in Pune. E.g. Vidyarthi Sahayyak Samiti, Lahoti Vidyarthi Bhavan, Prof. J. P. Trivedi memorial Trust Hostel, Firodiya Hostel, Baramati Hostel, Sharada Niketan, hostel for daughters of ex-servicemen, etc. Students staying in such hostel are not from any specific institute but from some specific community or background or place. Why these hostels are deprived of benefit of additional FSI?

There is a scheme for granting additional FSI to hospitals. Hospitals attract lot of traffic and crowding in the vicinity of relatives and visitors. They put immense load on the roads around the place and also add to crowding. e.g. areas around – Sasoon Hospital, Ruby Hall, Apollo Hospital, Poona Hospital, Deenanath Hospital, Sahyadri Hospital, etc. are always crowded and clogged of traffic. Granting additional FSI of 4 will only add to this crowding and at points will also delay emergency vehicles reaching the hospitals in time. We need to prevent such clogging of roads by some means if additional FSI is to be granted. We have to formulate new set of guidelines for ground coverage and minimum size of plot for such hospitals to avoid crowding and congestion in the surrounding vicinity. We must ensure that there is enough space to accommodate all the relatives, visitors, parking of vehicles of all the doctors, employees, and visitors and also the support services like medicine shops, canteens, ATM, etc. within the premises of the hospital.

There are plenty of suggestions (उपसूचना) which have been suggested by elected representatives with or without help of professionals and /or property related businessmen. While some of the suggestions are really innovative, worth considering and incorporating into final DP, many others are very much oriented to get some personal benefit or political mileage. I hope the general body will wisely pick up and incorporate only those which are benefitting larger part of city and majority citizen.

आमच्याही काही उपसूचना.

१.      रस्त्यावर होणाऱ्या पार्किंग बाबत – रस्त्यावर होणाऱ्या अनिर्बंध पार्किंगला वेसन घालायची असेल व जास्तीत जास्त नागरिकांनी सार्वजनिक वाहतूक व्यवस्थेचा वापर करण्यासाठी त्यांना उद्युक्त करायचे असेल तर रस्त्यावरील सर्वप्रकारच्या वाहनांच्या पार्किंगसाठी शुल्क लावून त्याचे संपूर्ण व्यवस्थापन पीएमपीएमएल कडे सोपवावे.
सदर शुल्काची आकारणी पुढील प्रमाणे असावी – पहिला अर्धा तास मोफत. अर्धा ते एक तास कालावधीसाठी दुचाकी १ रु. चारचाकी ५ रु. त्यानंतरच्या २ तासांपर्यंत संपूर्ण कालावधीसाठी दुचाकी ५ रु. चारचाकी २० रु. प्रती तास. तदनंतरच्या ४ तासांपर्यंत संपूर्ण कालावधीसाठी दुचाकी १५ रु. चारचाकी ५० रु. प्रती तास. त्यानंतरच्या ४ तासांपर्यंत प्रत्येक तासासाठी दुचाकी ३० रु. चारचाकी १०० रु. आठ तासांसाठी दैनिक पास – दुचाकी १०० रु. चारचाकी ३०० रु. बस, मालवाहू वाहने, स्टेन्ड व्यतिरिक्त उभ्या असलेल्या रिक्षा, यांना सुद्धा पार्किंग शुल्क असावे. असे करण्याने पार्किंग आपापल्या जागेमध्ये करण्याचे प्रमाण वाढेल व रस्त्यावरील पार्किंग कमी होईल. तसेच पीएमपीएमएलला त्यांची सेवा सुधारण्यासाठी पुरेसा निधी उपलब्ध होईल. सुरुवातीच्या काळात सदर पार्किंग शुल्क माणसे नेमून जमा करता येतील व ही पद्धत रुळल्यावर ठिकठिकाणी पार्किंग मीटर लावून ही पद्धत राबवता येईल.

२.      विजेचा वापर कमी करण्यासाठी जास्तीत जास्त इमारती कमी उंचीच्या बनविल्यास त्यामध्ये उद्वाहकाची आवश्यकता भासणार नाही व विजेची चांगलीच बचत होईल. त्यासाठी १२ मीटरपेक्षा कमी उंचीच्या व उद्वाह्काची सोय नसलेल्या रहिवाशी इमारतींना मालमत्ता करांमध्ये तसेच विकसन शुल्कामध्ये सूट मिळावी.

३.      नव्याने विकसित होणाऱ्या भागात अंतर्गत रस्त्यांची रुंदी पुढील प्रकारे असावी.
·         प्रभागातील प्रत्येक प्लॉटचे क्षेत्रफळ २५० चौ. मीटर पेक्षा कमी असल्यास ७५ मीटर लांबी पर्यंत ९ मीटर, ७५ ते १५० मी. पर्यंत १५ मीटर, १५० ते ३०० मी. पर्यंत १८ मीटर, ३०० मीटर पेक्षा जास्त २४ मीटर.
·         प्रभागातील प्रत्येक प्लॉटचे क्षेत्रफळ २५० चौ. मीटर पेक्षा जास्त पण १००० चौ. मीटर पेक्षा कमी असल्यास ७५ मीटर लांबी पर्यंत १५ मीटर, ७५ ते १५० मी. पर्यंत १८ मीटर, १५० ते ३०० मी. पर्यंत २४ मीटर, ३०० मीटर पेक्षा जास्त ३० मीटर.
·         प्रभागातील प्रत्येक प्लॉटचे क्षेत्रफळ १००० चौ. मीटर पेक्षा जास्त असल्यास ७५ मीटर लांबी पर्यंत १५ मीटर, ७५ ते १५० मी. पर्यंत २४ मीटर, १५० ते ३०० मी. पर्यंत ३० मीटर, ३०० मीटर पेक्षा जास्त ३६ मीटर.
·         कोणताही अंतर्गत रस्ता ९ मीटरपेक्षा कमी रुंदीचा नसावा. १५ व १८ मीटर रुंद रस्त्याच्या दोन्ही बाजूस कमीतकमी ३ मी. रुंदीचा फुटपाथ असावा. २४ मी. रुंदीच्या रस्त्यावर दोन्ही बाजूस कमीतकमी ४.५ मी. रुंदीचा फुटपाथ असावा. तसेच ३० मी. किंवा त्याहून जास्त रुंदीच्या रस्त्यांचे दोहो बाजूस कमीत कमी ६ मी. रुंदीचा फुटपाथ असावा.

४.      १५ मीटरपेक्षा कमी रुंद रस्त्यांचे लगतच्या प्लॉटवर टीडीआरचा वापर करता येवू नये.

५.      नव्याने तयार झालेला टीडीआर त्या जागेपासून २ कि.मी. परिघात वापरला जावा. अथवा विरळ वस्ती विभागाचे (सेक्टर II ते VI) ४ ते ६ प्रभाग करून तयार झालेला टीडीआर त्याच प्रभागात वापरला जावा.

६.      प्रीमियम चटई क्षेत्र हा नियम न होता फक्त अपवादात्मक परिस्थितीच असे चटई क्षेत्र दिले जावे.


संपूर्ण आराखडा हाती आल्यावर त्याचा अभ्यास करून आणखी लिहीनच. आज एव्हढेच पुरे...

Friday, September 21, 2012

Response to Mah tech education perspective plan

Directorate of technical Education Maharashtra state has prepared a perspective plan for technical Education in Maharashtra ( visit  http://fileserver.mkcl.org/approvedinstitues/OasisModules_Files/Files/69.pdf?did=186 )

Responses were invited on this perspective plan. Here is my response:

Vision 2020
It is essential to see that the technical education in Maharashtra is developed to respond to societal needs and aspirations.

Expansion
As on date ratio of admissions for engineering, pharmacy and management education to higher education is adequate but not regionally well balanced.
For Architecture ratio is still not very adequate and also is regionally imbalanced.
Demand pattern does not reflect Architecture related jobs. Growth of Architecture related jobs have direct relation to social well being and economic accomplishment of society in general.   This is different from engineering as the job growth in engineering is mainly dependent on industrial growth and promotion.

District wise augmentation
Data as shown regarding Architecture admissions is incorrect. In 2011-12, with few exceptions, all the seats at undergraduate courses in Architecture all over Maharahstra were full. (e.g. Your data shows 60 intake for Aurangabad district and 0 admitted. Reality for 2011-12 was intake was 80 and all seats were filled) Please correct the data. Please contact Maharashtra Association of Schools of Architecture for correct data.

Issues and recommendations in expansion
Community college is good idea. However, they should be expressly linked with premier institutions to get good standing and value. e.g. COEP running couple of community colleges in rural areas makes more sense than a private engineering college with little or no standing running the same.
At the same time we must encourage cross discipline education where credits could be transferred across discipline. A science student should be encouraged to acquire some credits from engineering or performing arts or management or architecture and vice versa. Such education will surely add value to overall education system.
All the old colleges with good standing should be actively supported and encouraged to become autonomous. Particularly government and government aided colleges should be immediately made autonomous. Actually, educational standards in old, reputed institutes are declining because of clubbing them with new institutions under the same university and faculty. All colleges say more than 20 years old, should be allowed to set their own curriculum and scheme of examinations that is only supervised by the university without active intervention.

Equity/ inclusiveness.
In Architecture education, particularly in government and government aided colleges gender ratio is much different than other disciplines like engineering, etc. Often there are more than 70% girls and less than 30% boys. May be in other professional streams – medicine, accountancy and law the situation is not very different. This has definite reflection in profession as the percentage of girls actually pursuing profession is very low. As such, availability of trained personnel in profession is declining and shortage of availability is already visible.  It must be reviewed and decided whether 30% reservation for girls is necessary for such courses.
Affordability is another very important reason for low enrollment. In reality, technical education is out of reach financially for many who wish to take it up and have right aptitude to do so.  Reserving certain number of seats in all institutions for deserving candidates who pay same amount fees as in government institutions is essential to overcome this problem. Whether this is to be done with cross subsidy within institute or through scholarships extended to such students by the government needs to be decided.
As a parallel exercise, in certain rural areas and small towns, where private institutions are reluctant to establish an institution for higher learning, government should take initiative and establish such institutes. Existing renowned government and government aided institutions may be asked to take up this task. However, it is also essential to control and see that the students admitted to such institutes are from its defined catchment area only so that seats are not filled up by students from urban areas.
Government and all its arms like local bodies, etc. should get its entire consultancy and research requirements fulfilled through academic institutions. This can a) save taxpayers’ money b) Keep the institutions updated of happenings in the field and eventually these institutions will be capable of offering such consultancy to private sector and generate good amount of endowment to support its own research and also subsidize education of needy and deserving students.

Excellence.
 Student: faculty ratio is marred by many factors such as recruitment rules, reservations, etc.  US/UK Universities mentioned in the report do not have any policy for reservations in jobs by virtue of caste/ religion/ language, etc. Educational and teaching merit is the only criteria. Many teaching positions are vacant as colleges are not able to get teachers of required reservation category and also of good academic standing. Often, academic merit criteria is diluted or overlooked to fill up a position that is reserved and undeserving candidates are recruited in such position. This compromises the education quality also.
Similarly, being good teacher and being knowledgeable person and two different things. A knowledgeable person with Ph.D. and number of papers to his credit may not be very good teacher. On the other hand a person with very basic qualification can also be an excellent teacher. Having aptitude to teach and ability to generate interest in students to learn does not have direct relationship with academic accomplishments of a person. This is a difficult area to deal with but the consensus could be evolved and system of identifying good and academically sound teachers could be devised. Good teacher, not very highly qualified can be recruited and encouraged to upgrade his academic qualification during his tenure.
The system today is very much examination oriented and therefore classroom based. This has its roots in school education. School education has adapted this method due to shortage of higher education opportunities of good quality; leading to extreme competition.
We must change the orientation from exam to knowledge. For this the established system of evaluation need complete review and overhaul. Once the importance is given to actual knowledge and capability of application of acquired knowledge rather than passing examination, the focus will automatically move from classroom based to practical.
To help teachers upgrade themselves and keep them updated, their teaching load needs to be reduced a little and they must also be free of many non teaching and administrative tasks that they are expected to do. (e.g. assisting and managing tasks like census, elections, other clerical duties and preparing of non academic reports, etc.) In reality, many teachers get very little time to read, carry out research and upgrade themselves. Keeping teachers busy with learning and research only is the requirement of the day.

Improving quality
I fully agree with most of the recommendations for improving quality. How to bring these recommendations into reality remains challenge.
For improving faculty, establishment of academic staff colleges is necessity. Rather than calling them academic staff colleges they should be called and function as resource centers.  They should be independent centers for each discipline as each discipline has its own specific requirements not shared with other disciplines. Such resource centers will help teachers upgrade their skills and knowledge through Short term courses, Ph. D. programs, research programs, etc. These centers should also serve as publication houses that can help teachers publish their research, thoughts and books. Further, these centers should also help universities and institution in preparing curriculums, design evaluation systems, etc. It should also create repository of knowledge and learning resources for teachers. National Institute of Advanced Studies in Architecture, Pune, (NIASA) established by the Council of Architecture is one of the good efforts in this direction.
Infrastructure development needs fresh thought. Normally, grants are available for establishing infrastructure but no grants are available for maintenance and up gradation. While sanctioning the grants for infrastructure there should be three distinct components – one time grant for establishing infrastructure, annual maintenance grant paid every year, upgradation grant paid after few years.
When one moves from terminal/ annual and university based exams to continuous college based evaluation, the responsibility of teacher and college increases. Many teachers and colleges are reluctant to assume this responsibility. Teachers at times do not have courage to tell non-performing students of their failure to meet the criteria of evaluation. Teachers therefore try to pass the buck to the university and the external examiners. Occasionally, they are also pressurized by the higher ups to pass un-deserving students for sake of displaying better overall performance of the institutes and also for financial compulsions. How many colleges and teachers are ready to accept autonomy in this area remains to be seen. In absence of transparent system there also exists possibility of victimization due to inter-personal relationships.

Research
Facilities to pursue Ph.D. should be widely available to everyone, particularly to teachers. In professional education, in lieu of Ph. D. the teachers should be encouraged to practice since every assignment in practice is a mini research opportunity in itself and such assignment brings in rich practical knowledge. Further, it also brings in a possibility to involve students who can learn as well as earn. However, teacher must document the entire assignment for benefit of others. Government and industry also must create opportunities for basic as well as applied research and provide sponsorships for the same.
Similarly, the resource institutions should themselves undertake research in technical education field and use certain colleges as testing beds for the research in technical education as well as education technology.
Residential campuses where teachers and students live on the same campus as the institute always provides better environment for research. Good examples are IITs, IISERs and IIMs. Such kind of residential campuses should be highly encouraged.

Monitoring and evaluation of framework
Certain confusions must be cleared. For example, accreditation of engineering education is globally covered under ‘Washington Accord’ but Architecture education is not covered under this accord. Accreditation of Architecture education is covered globally under ‘Canberra Accord’. This must be understood and architecture colleges should therefore be provided with independent program for accreditation that is complies with the ‘Canberra Accord’.  Most of the developed nations are already signatories of Canberra Accord and by virtue of being commonwealth country India is included under Commonwealth association of Architects (CAA) that is signatory for the Canberra Accord. The accreditation criteria for architecture courses should be based ion CAA program.
Globally, since ages, Architecture education is not clubbed with the engineering/ technical education but is recognized as independent faculty that is highly inter-disciplinary in nature. It’s high time we recognize this and grant independent faculty status to Architecture education.



Friday, November 25, 2011

Engineering education in India

Recently, I had been interacting with a few of my young Engineer friends, mostly from Civil and Mechanical background.

It was a learning experience to know - how much they know about their own vocation and industry. Further discussion lead to status of learning at colleges.

The whole discussion made me think about the engineering education system that we have been following since last many decades. I am not very sure but this also may be British legacy.

Last time I had suggested something was 7-8 years ago at the meeting of Faculty of Engineering at Pune University. I had suggested them to introduce credit system that will enable a candidate to get additional degree after graduation (BE) if he/she studies and acquired required credit points. e.g. BE (Mech) can get BE(Ele) if he just studies and acquires prescribed credits in the field. Everyone at the meeting liked the idea but the whole proposal of Credit system appears to be shelved till date.

I have come to believe that we need a fresh, outsider's look at the complete system of Technical Education, i.e. ITIs, Polytechnics and Colleges. (I do not dare to touch IITs as they represent altogether different league.) I am not competent enough to review (AICTE can appoint a committee) but I can surely throw in a few ideas that can be further tested by experts in the field.

I am trying to put my thoughts together and soon I will place them for your opinions and review here.